FeedAweber Wrongly Accuses Dietitians of Spamming
By Ian Lee on Aug 24, 2007 in Internet Marketing
I have always spoken highly of Aweber and have referred numerous clients to them. I’m afraid I have to retract my recommendation of this email service provider. I just spent a good part of today & yesterday dealing with an absurd email list management issue. An email from Aweber notified my client that as of immediately, verified double opt-in will be mandatory for their entire account.
Aweber Wrongly Accuses Dietitians of Spamming
The email goes on to explain that they “have been receiving numerous complaints regarding your specific account.” I found this comment to be absolutely ridiculous. As a nutrition community run by healthcare professionals, my client has never sent out any spam. Why am I sure of this? Because I manage all of their marketing initiatives. All newsletter subscribers signup to receive nutrition tips in the form of a newsletter. Their founder is a well-respected dietitian and frequently appears on TV. Her articles are regularly published on various media such as Reuters, USAToday etc…
0.2% Complaint Rate is Too High?
Being the largest online nutrition community run by Registered Dietitians, their list is obviously a fair size. The 0.2% complaint rate (as reported by Aweber’s own reports) is hardly alarming. In hopes of quickly resolving this issue, I called Aweber as soon as I received the notice.
After speaking with 2 representatives, a tier 1 support rep and his supervisor, I realized that my call was futile. Even before I had a chance to ask questions, the supervisor cuts me off. She declared that Aweber had made double opt-in mandatory for my client’s account. This action was not going to be reversed. All this even before I found out the possible root cause of the spamming accusations!
Take It or Leave It
Throughout the call, both reps cited a specific list name as the culprit. But this list does even not belong to my client! When challenged, they quickly accused other lists instead. The supervisor then firmly stated that there is no room for negotiation and that this move was ordered by their CEO Tom Kulzer. She continued to point out that we have no choice but to accept their mandatory measure. Her tone was offensive and dictated that my client had already been sentenced and we can either take it or leave it.
Still Have No Clear Answer
Instead of trying to resolve the issue, the supervisor avoided my questions. Up until this moment, I still do not know which list is supposedly causing the issue. Of the 4 lists cited:
-
- 1 does not belong to my client
- two are inactive test lists with 1 member (me!) and zero broadcasts
- the last one is an active list with 0.2% complaint rate & a 1% undeliverable rate
My client is very unhappy, so am I. Aweber is obviously not interested in keeping this business relationship with a legitimate healthcare organization. So I won’t waste anymore time trying to prove our innocence.
Can anyone recommend a good email service provider? Perhaps an ESP with more professionalism. Most importantly, someone credible who is willing to work with a customer to resolve issues when they arise?
![[Post to Twitter]](http://www.ads-links.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/tt-twitter.png){kind=icon}
| Stumble it! | Digg This | Email Page
|
 |
|
Loading ...
39 Comment(s)
By Carsten Cumbrowski on Aug 24, 2007 | Reply
Yep, that is not nice. I had a similar issue with a different vendor (not email). I eventually found the problem in the vendors system via reverse engineering some of the vendors processes. It took me a lot of time, but the accusation was as severe as being accused of intentional spamming or unethical business practices. You know after such experience that is time to go. I am surprised that this happened to you with AWeber who is regarded at forthcoming and helpful in solving any type of issue. They are obviously not, or not anymore.
A suggestion regardless of this incident. I would instate double opt-in for the email list. It is not required by any law or regulation and you also will significantly reduce the successful subscription rate, but you also reduce the number of incorrect emails that bounce right from the beginning and possible spam complaints will be reduced and conflicts easier solved.
If somebody can submit somebody else’s email address and activate the subscription without having access to the email owners inbox, there is a potential risk that spam complaints seem to be warranted, because the person who owns the email address really did never subscribe to your mailer and not just forgot it or is not interested in it any longer.
I don’t assume that your client bought any lists from a supposedly “good source”, but even if he did that and it was a good source, who knows where that good source got the list from. Third party lists are very tricky and dangerous and should not be acquired lightly. Just another recommendation.
I hope that double opt-in will become a legal requirement one day, even though the DMA would not be very happy about it. I would even go further and prohibit the use of any list where the user did not explicitly opt-in for. Explicitly does not mean “agreeing to receive emails from business partners and affiliates”, but agreeing to receive emails from YOU. But that is my opinion.
I recommend the book “Spam Wars” by Danny Goodman. It is a very informative and eye opening read. I thought I knew everything there is to know about this kind of stuff, but I was proven wrong. I hope I do now though, after I read it hehe.
I sent you the link to the email providers via FB already, but here it is once more
(because I have a hard time finding older stuff in FB to be honest, with all the apps are information all over the place)
Cheers!
Carsten
By Mike on Aug 24, 2007 | Reply
Ian, I think I will follow you and take my business away from Aweber too. I also went with Aweber (you recommended Aweber to me!) and I don’t agree with their practice. I think as a customer, I should have the right to choose what it’s good for my business. Double opt-in is certainly better. For my business, we don’t choose double opt-in as we rely heavily on lead gen and PPC! Besides, Aweber’s verification email sucks! Even I thought it looks like spam with some stupid code on the subject line and pure text…… Aweber hasn’t enforced this on my account yet, but if it happens to you Ian, it will come to me soon so it’s time for me to take it somewhere too!
By Ian Lee on Aug 24, 2007 | Reply
Hi Carsten,
Thanks for the words of sympathy and for sharing your great list!
I agree with you. I run other lists that are double opted-in.
To address a few of your concerns. My client has never purchased a list. In fact, they don’t even run paid advertising to acquire names. All signups have been generated from their own website.
I never thought doing things right and running a list with a 0.2% complaint rate and a 1% undeliverable rate would result in this kind of customer abuse. It’s the bad attitude and unwillingness to work with us to resolve the issue (if there is one at all) at hand that irriates me.
Let me get back to you on FB with our short list. I am going to need more help from you on this one!
Thanks again Carsten.
@Mike: Hang in there. Once I find a solution, I will be sure to post back. I hope it will help you and others in the future.
By Kelly Robbins on Aug 25, 2007 | Reply
I recently started using Aweber with a new list I have. I haven’t had any issues with them yet, but what concerns me is their unwillingness to talk to you — to teach you about what happened.
That kind of terrible customer service would infuriate me and you are right to be angry.
Kelly Robbins
http://www.AMarketingConnection.com
By Doug Lietz on Aug 25, 2007 | Reply
That’s disapponting to hear how Aweber has handled this situation with you and your client Ian. Please keep us all up to date with how everything unfolds. It will be interesting to know which service provider you end up going with and how their deliverability claims compare to Aweber’s… not to mention, how they rank on the customer relations score card. Good luck with the transition.
Regards,
Doug
By Jim Kukral on Aug 25, 2007 | Reply
I know Tom, the owner. I also use Aweber. I think that something must be amiss here. While I believe you Ian, I am sure that there is an explanation for this that Tom can maybe clear up. Dunno.
I know one thing, you’re hard pressed to find a solution that is as diligent about keeping squeaky clean lists as them, which is probably their biggest advantage.
By Face Natural on Aug 25, 2007 | Reply
I used Aweber before and wasn’t all that impressed. No bad experiences just didn’t see why all the hype. I’ve decided to use getresponse.com after reading this.
By Tom Brownsword on Aug 26, 2007 | Reply
Hello Ian,
Glad to find your blog and I think that your analysis of the situation is quite fair.
Aweber is a good company and Tom Kulzer is a good guy, but Aweber does have a tendency to want to whip out their Terms of Service and beat you over the head with them at the slightest hint of a problem.
I pretty much got my head handed to me by Aweber when I had a recent billing and cancellation issue with them. I wanted to cancel and did so by simply not making the renewal payment. To be fair, their terms do state that you have to take certain steps to cancel — steps which I did not take. However, I was not using their service at renewal time, but in spite of this fact, they still insist that I pay for a year’s worth of service that I simply won’t use.
I, too, have moved on because of this, and should Tom Kulzer ever see this post, please take it to heart. Work with people; don’t use your Terms of Service as a hammer. We love your service but thought we had a partner, not a judge!
Best regards,
Tom
By Tom Kulzer (AWeber CEO) on Aug 27, 2007 | Reply
Ian,
Read thru your post here and thoroughly understand you’re upset
about last weeks actions with your account.
As with any email service provider we take each and every spam
complaint received very seriously. The actions taken had nothing
to do with the % complaint rate reports that you receive which
are derived from ISP’s such as Yahoo, AOL, and others. I
specifically received a complaint from someone receiving email
from one of your lists that should have never been subscribed
in the first place. I personally turned on confirmed opt-in
to prevent the issue from occurring again, and I personally
asked our support team manager to contact you about the issue.
Whether you feel the complaint is real or warranted is your opinion.
Based on 9+ years in the industry I do believe it was warranted
and took steps to prevent it from occurring again harming both
your company, AWeber, and that of thousands of other small
businesses relying on our service to get their email delivered.
As others in this comment thread have mentioned, confirmed
opt-in is the absolute best way to manage a subscriber list
and ensure that those on your list actually requested to
be on the list. This is a practice we strongly recommend for
all clients and is in fact the default for many. Businesses
large and small have adopted this as a means to make sure their
email is only delivered to those who want it and thus avoiding
issues such as the one you experienced. CNN, Microsoft, Oprah, CNet,
bellagio.com, IRS.gov, weather.com, ign.com, maxim.com,
tgifridays.com, olivegarden.com, and even Whitehouse.gov all
use confirmed opt-in.
Terms of service are in place to not only protect customers and
their rights, but also to protect the tens of thousands of others
that depend on the service to reliably deliver their email. Without
rigorous enforcement of those terms, our service and others in the
ESP industry would be completely useless. I’d be happy to speak
with you about the account offline, as I can’t go into any further
detail than what you’ve already posted, ironically, due to our
terms of service regarding customer privacy. One I’m sure everyone
is happy we abide by.
By Mike on Aug 27, 2007 | Reply
I was naive to think that someone can fix this Aweber issue for Ian. After reading Tom Kulzer’s post, I have to agree with Tom Brownsword that Aweber is whipping out its TOS. I don’t know the details but it looks that there are a few lists under Ian’s account - and because there are problems in one list (as posted by Tom Kulzer himself), Aweber CEO ordered to have all other lists penalized. Ian, you are right, it’s obvious that your client has been sentenced!
By Carsten Cumbrowski on Aug 27, 2007 | Reply
Mike, a customer with bad emails can cause trouble for AWeber, serious ones. This is no joke. without confirmed or double opt-in could somebody sign-up for somebody else, as a prank or to harm the advertiser and/or the email services provider.
You might also want to check my post at ReveNews about this and also the comments.
Post at RN.
As mentioned in an earlier comment. Buy a copy of Danny Goodman’s book. It’s $17.95 or less on Amazon.com. If you do email marketing, you should read it.
Tom: As mentioned earlier, it seems to me that the issue was not communicated well to Ian and his client. They want of course know what happened. Ian stated that his attempts to find out what was going on was left on his shoulders without getting any help from your staff, on the contrary, they blocked him off with a comment like “we did what we did, period, live with it!” .. end of communication.
Your actions to Ian’s clients account is harmful to the clients business. Double opt-in will cause a significant drop in successful subscription rate, that will translate into hard dollars lost. I think a client deserves a detailed answer, why he should accept this loss in revenue.
Just another suggestion. Cheers. Carsten
By Carsten Cumbrowski on Aug 27, 2007 | Reply
Mike, question. You switched Ian’s client to “confirmed opt-in” or “double opt-in”? There is a big difference. See this post at b2bemailmarketing.com about that.
By Ian Lee on Aug 27, 2007 | Reply
Tom,
It sure has been a long time since we last chatted and it is unfortunate that we meet again under these circumstances.
There is no argument that double opt-in is a good method for handling list subscription. Indeed, two lists under this client’s account is double opt-in so they are aware of the benefits. The issue I personally have is not with this. It is the fact of being accused of spamming and not being provided with anymore information so we can resolve the problem.
Again, of the 4 lists cited by both your staff members, 1 does not belong to my client. Two are inactive test lists with zero broadcasts. And an active list that has been running on a website run by healthcare professionals for close to 8 years. When asked which one of these lists could be the cause of the spam issues, the hard-handed reply was that you gave the order and it’s final.
Tom, I do not see any benefit in contacting you offline - your staff has made it more than clear that there is no room for further discussion. As a long time customer and someone who publicly endorsed your company for so long, being served an ultimatum and not given the opportunity to work with your team to trace down the issue at hand is certainly not what I had hoped from a quality service provider.
By Tom Kulzer (AWeber CEO) on Aug 27, 2007 | Reply
Requiring confirmed opt-in is not a penalty and it’s definitely not meant to be. It’s a best practice and one that every business should be using. AWeber and many other responsible email service providers are moving in that direction as it’s the only way to ensure the subscribers on a list requested to be there.
I’ll pose the same question here I’ve posted elsewhere in relation to this thread. Mike, Ian, or others, how would you have handled this to stop the complaints and flow of unsolicited email from either an unintentional or intentional act?
I sit within earshot of Tracey’s workstation and do
recall overhearing the conversation with Ian, admittedly only what Tracey was saying. Based on what I heard, Ian’s account of the interaction isn’t the full story and was also abruptly ended when he hung up on Tracey. We pro actively contacted Ian about the problem and yet somewhere along the way the communication wasn’t what wanted to be heard.
We take many steps to educate our customers on the virtues of confirmed opt-in and why it is good for their businesses. A search on our site for “confirmed opt-in” or “verified opt-in” will show a wealth of information. Unfortunately I believe that much of the frustration in this situation resolves from misinformation in the general business community that confirmed opt-in is the death knife to opt-in lists. Well over 50% of our customer base would disagree with that assumption as would many of the large businesses I quoted above using confirmed opt-in.
I, nor anyone here, have called Ian’s clients intentional spammers. If we did, they wouldn’t be clients here anymore as we have zero tolerance for intentional abuse. The pro active contact about the unintentional spam and the requirement to use confirmed opt-in is here to prevent that situation from turning in a direction that every marketer doesn’t want to see.
By Ian Lee on Aug 27, 2007 | Reply
Mike, I was also surprised to learn from Tom’s post that after a problem from one list, he took action on all lists.
I am now beginning to wonder if it was indeed one of the inactive test lists that is the culprit. I regularly see spammers trying to subscribe to it by sending chain emails to that list but the spammers never achieve “Active” status (as reported by Aweber) since users subscribing by email is required to go through a confirmed opt-in process set up by Aweber.
Of course, this is just my guess as I am pretty much still in the dark as to the original cause.
By Ian Lee on Aug 27, 2007 | Reply
Tom, this thread has been quite professional up until this point. Now come your new personal attacks on me about hanging up on your staff.
You run a call center and I’m sure you have recorded the call. I encourage you post it for all to hear exactly what happened on the call.
By Carsten Cumbrowski on Aug 27, 2007 | Reply
Tom: okay, you are talking about double opt-in. I know that confirmed opt-in is used for double opt-in as well, the problem with that term is only that it is ambiguous. Confirmed opt-in is used (wrongly) by people for the process of sending the user just a welcome message that confirms the subscription with a link to opt-out.
Also the term “confirmed” implies that nothing more is needed. It’s a language thing. I would use double opt-in and confirmed opt-in to make people aware what you refer to exactly to avoid possible misunderstandings.
Could it be that confirmed opt-in is a newer term that was introduced within the last 2-3 years? I always use double opt-id to indicate that TWO actions are needed by the user in order to opt-in successfully.
Thanks
Carsten
By Tom Kulzer (AWeber CEO) on Aug 27, 2007 | Reply
Ian, none of my posts here have been intended to attack you or anyone else. I was only stating fact as was known to me. As mentioned earlier I only know what I overheard from Tracey’s side of the conversation. If we had a recording I’d of certainly listened to it before posting here. I’m truly sorry if my information about the close of that call is incorrect.
I’m very sorry that our conversation has taken this turn and can only hope to have more fruitful interactions in the future. As mentioned before, I’m more than happy to speak with you about this offline where the details about the issue can be discussed. For obvious privacy issues of both you and your client that’s not something I can get into here. You have my contact info.
By shazad on Aug 27, 2007 | Reply
ooo seems to be a little tension soaring here calm down children
By Ken on Aug 28, 2007 | Reply
It seems the “CEO” is missing the point in much the same way the original rep did and is content to merely generalize, i.e. “I believe that much of the frustration in this situation resolves from misinformation in the general business community that confirmed opt-in is the death knife to opt-in lists.”
The debate is not about the merits of “confirmed opt in”, it’s about the specifics of just how this client ran afoul of the TOS. How can a client ensure that the “offense” does not occur again if the provider steadfastly refuses to even talk about specifics?
What it appears to boil down to is, “we’re going to do what we’re going to do and the details make no difference.”
I’m glad I came across this, I need to set up a couple of lists for clients but I have no time for providers who do not feel the need get into pesky details to help clients identify the root cause of problems and prevent reoccurrence.
By Tom Kulzer (AWeber CEO) on Aug 28, 2007 | Reply
Ken, no one here has “steadfastly refused to even talk about specifics.” I’ve offered twice in this thread to speak with Ian personally, and the support manager that he spoke with previously was doing the same until Ian hung up on her.
As mentioned before, I can’t for privacy reasons discuss here why Ian and his client ran afoul of the TOS.
It’s awfully hard to help someone who doesn’t want to take the time to listen to the specifics.
By Tom Kulzer (AWeber CEO) on Aug 28, 2007 | Reply
Ken, no one here has “steadfastly refused to even talk about specifics.” I’ve offered twice in this thread to speak with Ian personally, and the support manager that he spoke with previously was doing the same until Ian hung up on her.
As mentioned before, I can’t for privacy reasons discuss here why Ian and his client ran afoul of the terms of service.
It’s awfully hard to help someone who doesn’t want to take the time to listen to the specifics.
By Mike on Aug 28, 2007 | Reply
Hey Ian, did I miss something? I came back today to check out the thread and I don’t seem to see the CEO posts. What happened to his posts? I think he made 2 posts yesterday…….
By Carsten Cumbrowski on Aug 28, 2007 | Reply
Ken, valid points. I tried to explain this to the CEO who commented on the post at my blog about this incident. The problem is not really about WHAT the issue is (no matter how severe it might or might not be), but HOW the company approached and dealt with it. The WHAT can then be addressed along the way, publicly or in private.
By Ian Lee on Aug 28, 2007 | Reply
Hey, now the posts by Tom Kulzer, CEO of Aweber, have all disappeared. Any wordpress experts know if comments can be deleted by someone else rather than the admin?
By Mike on Aug 28, 2007 | Reply
r u kidding? His posts are really all gone? That’s hilarious! who deleted them?
By Ian Lee on Aug 28, 2007 | Reply
Hey Mike, I for sure did not delete Tom’s 3 posts. I am now seeking help from experts to find out exactly what happened.
By Ken on Aug 28, 2007 | Reply
This is interesting.
Ian, I came to your site in a round about way but when I have time I’m going to peruse in depth and maybe you can help me with a few things.
And for what it’s worth, I see absolutely nothing wrong with the way you’ve handled this issue. It will be interesting to see if you get “blacklisted” from AWeber altogether.
Ken
By Ian Lee on Aug 28, 2007 | Reply
As of this momnet, it looks like Tom’s comments have been flagged as spam by Spam Karma 2. Not sure of the exact reason but Tom’s IP address and comments have been blacklisted. I am working with some experts to bring the comments back.
Thank you Carsten Cumbrowski and Andy Beard for your help in this technical challenge we are having. Andy, you truly are THE blogging expert!
By Ian Lee on Aug 28, 2007 | Reply
Update: All the comments are back. I have also added Tom’s IP in the whitelist of Spam Karma 2 just in case.
By Ken on Aug 28, 2007 | Reply
Thanks for your reply Tom but I’m not that thick you didn’t have to say it twice. There are ways to address the issue in a more relevant way without breaching privacy if in fact privacy is even a real concern here. If it is, the response would have merely cited that fact and nothing more.
But it seems alot of time was spent putting forth the idea that the problem was with someone’s lack of acceptance and understanding of the general concepts of “opt in”.
If Ian still doesn’t know which list was being cited as the offender, how can anyone honestly talk about being forthcoming with details? Was he offered your personal time BEFORE he went public with this? Your involvement at this point appears to be nothing more than damage control.
Ken
By Carsten Cumbrowski on Aug 28, 2007 | Reply
Ken “Your involvement at this point appears to be nothing more than damage control.” …. that could have been the opportunity to find out what the key problems where that caused the (unnecessary) escalation of the issue and resulted in the termination of a customer relationship in bad terms.
The second opportunity would have been to find possible solutions that would prevent the escalation with other customers for the same or similar reasons and to demonstrate them in public for everybody to see.
All that would have been resulted into just another opportunity from a PR perspective to show if and how problems are being handled by the company and how a negative incident can be turned into a case study with positive outcome that could be used as reference for other companies.
Web 2.0 is not only good to raise public awareness of problems, but also to resolve them and learn something from it.
By Christina Newberry on Aug 28, 2007 | Reply
What an interesting read. As someone who has worked in the Internet Marketing industry for 5+ years I’m a little puzzled by (a) the confusion in terms as far as confirmed opt-in, double opt-in, etc. (if you mean double opt-in, might as well just say it), the comparison of the effects of double opt-in on huge multi-million-dollar companies vs. SMEs/SOHO companies (apples and oranges, anyone?, and (c) the fact that this seems to all have resulted from one(!) complaint that just happened to get to the CEO.
Also, I’m a bit surprised that the CEO of AWeber has the time to be personally responding to issues like this… especially when his comments don’t seem terribly professional or helpful. If th CEO’s going to get involved in a thread like this, you’d expect the reponse to be a clear resolution offered in one post — probably in 20 words or less! Crazy!
By Ken on Aug 28, 2007 | Reply
Most rational human beings understand that mistakes will be made, things will fall through the cracks and even the most diligent company/entity will have so called “field failures”. The true test always is how these things are handled once they occur. Will they avoid or minimize the issue by “deflection” or will they treat the customer’s problem as they would a poisonous snake poised to strike, quickly with overwhelming force to end the matter immediately?
The problem is anyone who has had experience with net companies who have a TOS agreement, have also had the experience of having it waived in their faces as a discussion ender when problems arise with no room for taking the customer’s particular needs into account.
The reflexive action when the customer has concerns about something like this often is to go on the defensive and whip out the TOS.
I can’t help but think that if the approach is more along the lines of “You know what, you have a valid concern and at my company we take such concerns very seriously. Let’s work together on finding a solution we all can live with.”, you can transform a concerned, often agitated customer into one of your greatest advocates who sings your praises every chance they get.
Don’t we all need as many such individuals as we can get?
Ken
By Mike on Aug 28, 2007 | Reply
It’s so hilarious that the CEO was blocked by your spam filter!!!
My understanding of the sequence of event is:
1. CEO received a spam complaint from one list
2. CEO ordered to switch ALL lists to double opt in
3. CEO asked a staff to notify Ian’s client
To me, this is not proactively solving an issue. That is, “hey dude, i dont’care what’s your story but this is my decision as per our TOS”.
If Aweber has attempted to solve an issue, before ordering a switch on all lists….
a. someone could have call Ian’s client to find out more
b. email Ian’s client to find out more
c. fax to Ian’s client to find out more
e. send a snail mail to Ian’s client find out more
By Patrick on Sep 20, 2007 | Reply
The point I thought was interesting in this is that a single complaint apparently started this mess. I don’t know how big the list is, but seriously, one complaint?
Did someone spell their name wrong by accident? That could certainly happen once every 20,000 signups or so. Did they try to opt-out but the page failed to load? That could certainly happen once every 1,000 attempts.
Using a single person’s experience, good or bad, as the basis for a decision that would harm a company when the technology involved isn’t foolproof seems like overkill.
If they were selling penis enlargement pills, I’d be less tempted to give them the benefit of the doubt, but this sounds like a real company with a solid track record of doing the right thing.
50 kids die a year because their parents forget they left them in the car seat. Is it really that difficult to believe that one person could forget they signed up for an email list?
By Sanford Wallace on Sep 30, 2007 | Reply
Yup its the former Spam King, Sanford Wallace, here. I’ve been saying this for quite some time and I’ll say it again. Tom is a hypocrite. He screams and cries about confirmed opt-in yet he still refuses to default ALL accounts to that setting… why? … because his company KNOWS the benefits of allowing single opt-in as well. So while he punishes accounts for one or two complaints related to single opt-in, he continues to profit by allowing most of his clients to ignore his public outcry about it. Tom has always made decisions based on profits vs. consequences and it has little to do with “right” and “wrong.”
By Myles Agnew on Jan 6, 2008 | Reply
Wow I’ve been researching on aweber looking for a hosting solution to for my email list and found this great blog.
I congratulate Tom for spending the time to post on this blog not many CEO’s would do that.
I would of thought in this day and age that you would WANT a double optin?
Why? to confirm that the subscriber address is real and it’s a valid address.
Sure it’s an extra few seconds for the subscriber but why would you want to waste time with someone who’s not interested in what you’ve got to email?
By Ian Carlson on Apr 25, 2009 | Reply
Let me confirm Aweber Tier 1 support is only good for reading scripted responses to nontechnical questions and refuse to escalate when the issue exceeds their knowledge or access. After attempts at live chat, phone, and now a ticket open for over a week with no response Aweber refuses to provide any SMTP dialog details for emails they have mishandled. Please understand when considering Aweber as a email marketing solutions if you have anything but a basic setup problem seeking help will make you wish you selected another solution.